Cover Image

Conversations in clay: Engaging community through a socially engaged public art project

Kira Hegeman

Abstract


Throughout the course of a given day individuals may weave in and out of shared spaces, passing one another on the trails of a public park or across the stones of a city square, often anonymously, perhaps with a fleeting smile or nod.  Creative placemaking, the practice of creating venues that enable community members to express their relationships with one another as well as the physical environment (Webb, 2014), offers a chance to re-envision the community-building capacity of such public spaces. In this paper I describe the process of designing and facilitating a socially engaged public art project for Art on the Atlanta Beltline, a temporary, annual public art festival in Atlanta, Georgia. Conceived as both an art installation and a site for informal art education, this project illustrates the potential for art making in public spaces to invite conversation and encourage empathic interaction between diverse community members.  


Keywords


Creative Placemaking; Public Art; Socially Engaged Art; Conversation; Community; Clay; Participation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Art on the Atlanta Beltline. (2015, September 23). Retrieved from http://art.beltline.org/.

Barrett, T. (2010). Aesthetics, conversations, and social change. In T.Costantino & B.White (Eds.), Essays on aesthetic education for the 21st Century (pp.123-142). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Barret, T. (2013). Writing towards empathy. In T.Costantino & B.White (Eds.), Aesthetics, empathy and education (pp.29-39). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Biesta, G. (2012). Becoming public: Public pedagogy, citizenship and the public sphere. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(7), 683-697.

Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. France: Les presses du reel.

Carroll, N. (2004). Art and human nature. Journal of Aesthetics & Art Criticism, 62(2), 95-107. doi:10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00143.x

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Kappa Delta Pi.

Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Freeman, M., & Vasconcelos, E.S. (2010). Critical social theory: Core tenets, inherent issues. New Directions for Evaluation, (127), 7-19.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Grodach, C. (2010). Art spaces, public space and the link to community development. Community Development Journal, 45(4), 474-493.

Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art. New York, NY: Jorge Pinto Books.

Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veneema, S., & Sheridan ,K. (2007). Studio thinking: the real benefits of visual arts education. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.

Kester, G.H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. Berkely: University of California Press.

Richardson, J. (2010). Interventionist art education: Contingent communities, social dialogue, and public collaboration. Studies in art education, 52(1), 18-33

Webb, D. (2014). Placemaking and social equity: Expanding the framework of creative placemaking. Artivate: A Journal of Entrepreneurship in the Arts, 3(1), 35-48.

Wheatley, M. (2002). Turning to one another: Simple conversations to restore hope to the future. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.